AI girlfriend apps, compared on what you can actually check
Every list of AI girlfriend apps you will find ranks them on how good the conversation feels, which is the one thing nobody can check on your behalf. This one ranks nothing. It compares the things a person can verify before paying: whether the price is published at all, what the vendor says it does with what you write, and what its own terms prohibit. That turns out to separate these products more sharply than any score would. Of the nine here, four publish no price anywhere. One states plainly that your conversations never train a model; most do not address the question. Two are operated by companies that print a registered address you can look up, and one will not print its own name in readable text. Every figure below is dated and linked to the vendor page it came from. Where we could not establish something, the page says so rather than guessing.
What qualifies for this list
- A persistent character you return to, rather than a one-off image or story generator
- Publishes terms and a privacy policy at citable URLs, so the claims can be quoted and archived
- No credible reporting of the product generating sexual content involving minors
- Does not offer removing clothing from photographs of real people, transplanting a real face into generated material, or sexual imagery of an identifiable person
What this page does not cover
Most of the search behind this page is for things ClickTug does not list. Saying so is quicker than letting you scroll a table that was never going to help.
- Photo-editing prompts and image filters
- A large share of this search is people looking for prompts to restyle a photograph, which is an image-editing task rather than a companion product. ClickTug lists tools, not prompts.
- Films, celebrity rumours and games
- Much of the surrounding search is about a film plot, a rumour about an actor, or a horror game. None of it is a product anyone can sign up for.
- Anything built on a real person's likeness
- Apps that generate a companion from an uploaded photograph of someone are refused outright, whatever else they do. Our content policy explains why.
The list

Kindroid
The only one here that verifies age with a third party rather than asking you to tick a box
Companion chat with voice calls and generated selfies, and the strictest age check in this category.

Candy AI
The most specific content policy of any companion app we have read, from a named EU company. It publishes no price at all
Adult companion chat and images, with the most specific content policy here and no price before signup.
AI Angels
The strongest wording on minors: it prohibits any depiction of persons appearing under 18, which tests apparent age rather than a stated number
Unfiltered companion chat with photos, video and voice calls, from a named Estonian company.

EVA AI
Mobile-first, and the only one whose prices you can check in an app store before installing
Mobile-first AI companion with the most detailed child safety policy here, priced in the app stores.

AIGirlfriends.ai
The only vendor here that publishes what its model refuses and describes what happens when you ask
Companion chat with voice calls, a published transparency report and a refusal list the model enforces mid-conversation.

GirlfriendGPT
Publishes a full corporate group rather than one shell, and splits its likeness rules between ordinary people and public figures
Companion chat with voice and images from a named Canadian company, with a small free allowance and no refunds.

976.ai
The best free tier: 20 tokens a day that renew indefinitely and reach every character, with voice included
AI companion chat with a real free allowance every day, and terms that specify no governing law.

DreamGF
A named Romanian company with GDPR attached. Read the recurring price rather than the advertised one
AI companion and image generation from a named Romanian company, with introductory pricing well below the renewal.
Honeybot
Straightforward companion chat with its pricing stated up front, which is rarer here than it should be
AI companion chat with generated images, video and voice, and free tokens before any payment.
Trust and terms, side by side
The facts that decide whether to trust a tool rather than whether to try it. Every value is taken from the vendor's own published pages on the date shown on each listing. A blank is never a guess: where a vendor publishes nothing, the cell says so.
| Tool | From | Age check | Trains on your content | Deletion | Filtering | Minors policy | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindroid | $15.99/mo | Document or third-party verification | Not documented | Self-serve in account settings | Light filtering | Published | Los Angeles, California, United States |
| Candy AI | On request | Self-declared at signup | Yes | On request to support | Light filtering | Published | Malta |
| AI Angels | $12.99/mo | Self-declared at signup | Not documented | On request to support | No documented output filter | Published | Estonia, Tallinn, governed by Estonian law |
| EVA AI | $11.99/mo | Self-declared at signup | Not documented | On request to support | Light filtering | Published | Not stated on the vendor site; listed as the App Store seller |
| AIGirlfriends.ai | On request | Self-declared at signup | No | On request to support | Moderate filtering | Published | New York, United States, at Staten Island |
| GirlfriendGPT | On request | Self-declared at signup | Not documented | On request to support | Light filtering | Published | Quebec, Canada, with subsidiaries in Delaware and Cyprus |
| 976.ai | $10.99/mo | Self-declared at signup | Not documented | On request to support | Light filtering | Not published | Delaware, United States. Named in the site footer, not in the terms |
| DreamGF | $25.99/mo | Self-declared at signup | Not documented | On request to support | Light filtering | Published | Romania, Bucharest, registered J40/12952/2023 |
| Honeybot | $11.99/mo | Self-declared at signup | Not documented | On request to support | Light filtering | Published | Nevada, United States |
Questions people actually ask
What is the best AI girlfriend app?
It depends which risk you care about. If you want the strongest identity checks, Kindroid is the only one here using third-party age verification. If you want the most specific content policy, Candy AI. If you want to try something properly without paying, 976.ai gives 20 tokens a day that renew forever. ClickTug publishes no overall score, because the thing people mean by best here is how the conversation feels, and nobody can measure that for you.
Are there free AI girlfriend apps?
Several, but the word free is doing different work in each. 976.ai gives a daily allowance that renews indefinitely. Backyard AI gives 300 messages a week at the same context size as its paid plan. Others advertise free access on the homepage while their pricing page lists only paid plans, and publish no allowance at all. Each listing states which kind it is.
Do AI girlfriend apps keep my conversations?
Almost all of them, and most will not tell you for how long. Of the tools ClickTug tracks, only a handful state a retention period as a number. Fewer still say whether your conversations are used to train models. Where a vendor does not address it, our listings record that as not documented rather than assuming an answer in either direction.
Which AI girlfriend apps verify your age?
One, of those listed here. Kindroid uses third-party age verification. Every other tool in this guide asks you to confirm you are over 18 and checks nothing. Several publish policies about minors that are stronger than their verification, which is a gap worth knowing about before assuming a policy is a control.
Can an AI girlfriend app use a photo of a real person?
Not on anything ClickTug lists. Products built around uploading a photograph of a real person are refused outright, and several tools here prohibit it in their own terms too. If a service offers to build a companion from a picture of someone you know, that is the workflow this directory exists to refuse.
Every figure on this page comes from the vendor's own pages on the date shown, and each tool's listing links the document it was read from. Something out of date? Tell us. How we check anything is on our methodology page.