Submit a tool
Last updated 11 Sept 2026
ClickTug lists AI companion, roleplay and dating apps. Every listing is written by us from the vendor’s own pages, carries the date it was checked, and says what the vendor does not publish as well as what it does.
Submitting a tool for review carries a processing charge. Write to [email protected] for the current terms before submitting. It covers the verification work described below, and it does not buy a verdict, a position or copy approval.
Use the form above, or write to [email protected] with your product URL and the policy links below. Both reach the same people.
What we require before we will review a submission
A published price, with actual numbers. A pricing page on your own site is the usual way. An App Store or Google Play listing counts too: those figures are published by you and checkable by anyone, and requiring a web pricing page from a product that sells only through a store would be a rule about your distribution rather than your transparency.
This is the one requirement that is no longer absolute, and it is worth explaining why it changed. Screening several hundred services in this category showed that about a fifth publish a price which cannot be read without passing an age gate or running their JavaScript. That is a real price, published in good faith, that a reader simply cannot see before committing. Refusing to list those punished the wrong thing.
So a listing can now proceed without a readable figure. What it cannot do is stay quiet about it. Where the price is not readable, the listing says so in the place the number would have been, and states whether we could not read it or you did not publish one. Those are different facts and readers get told which.
“Contact us” pricing is still the weakest case. It is a legitimate business model and it leaves nothing to compare, which is most of what this directory is for.
A public privacy policy that says how long you keep user content, whether you train on it, and how someone deletes it.
A public acceptable use policy that states what your service prohibits.
A minor safety policy, if you publish one. This was a hard requirement until 9 August 2026 and is now a question we answer on your listing either way.
The rule changed because our own screening argued against it. Of several hundred services read automatically, roughly one in eight said anything at all about minors anywhere in their documents, and the ones that did were not reliably the better products. A clothing-removal service we refuse to list publishes a minor safety policy. A companion app we excluded on documented findings published one too, alongside a price, terms and a privacy policy. Two of the better-run services in this category publish nothing on the subject and have no adverse record anywhere.
So the requirement was testing whether a document existed rather than how a product behaves. What replaced it is a check on the record: before anything is published we look for reporting, incident records and independent testing concerning the vendor, and evidence of the product generating sexual content involving minors or people presented as minors excludes it whatever its terms say. That has already excluded vendors whose paperwork was complete.
What you publish about minors still appears on your listing, as a row that reads either Published, with a link to it, or Not published, with the date we checked and where we looked. If you would rather that row said the first thing, publishing a policy is inexpensive.
If the privacy policy or the acceptable use policy is missing, the submission is still declined at the first step.
What we will not list
We do not accept products that are principally designed for:
- removing clothing from photographs of real people;
- generating sexual imagery of an identifiable person without documented consent;
- sexual imagery of public figures;
- anything involving minors, or people represented as minors;
- distributing intimate images of a person who did not consent to their distribution.
This is not buried in our terms and it is not negotiable at any price. Our content policy explains why, and explains that the boundary is enforced by our software rather than by our goodwill: a listing describing an excluded capability cannot be saved to our content store, so it cannot be published.
Submitting a product in one of those categories will not get a reply.
How review works
- You submit. Product URL plus your policy links.
- We check the policies, and we check the record. Whether a privacy policy and an acceptable use policy exist at citable URLs, whether the product is inside what we cover, and what independent reporting, incident databases and published testing say about it. The second half is the one that actually excludes vendors.
- We use the product, including signing up, so we can record what signup actually requires.
- We write the listing. Pricing tiers, free-tier terms, whether a card is needed to start, platforms, generation modes, retention, training, deletion, payment methods, company and jurisdiction, each with the vendor page it was read from.
- We publish it, with today’s date and the name of whoever checked it.
Nothing goes live automatically. There is no self-service publishing on this site, for moderation, quality and legal reasons that should be obvious given the category.
What a listing gets you
A direct link. Our outbound links go to your own URL carrying a ref=clicktug parameter, with no redirect in between and no referrer suppression, so our referrals appear in your own analytics under our name.
An accurate listing. Written by someone who used the product, rechecked on a schedule, and corrected within a day of you telling us something is wrong.
What a listing does not get you
A position. The processing charge buys review, not placement. Order is a whole number assigned by hand in each listing file and is described in full on the methodology page, where anyone can read what produces it.
Copy approval. We write the verdict and the limitations. You can correct a fact; you cannot edit an opinion.
A guarantee it stays up. Listings are removed when a product shuts down, stops being verifiable, or adds a capability we exclude.
Corrections
Already listed and something is wrong? Report the listing. Corrections from the vendor about their own product are the fastest kind for us to verify, and fixing a factual error is free and always will be.
Frequently asked questions
How much does it cost to be listed?
Submitting a tool for review carries a processing charge. Write to [email protected] for the current terms before you submit. The charge covers the verification pass: we read your pricing, privacy and acceptable use pages, search the public record and use the product. It does not buy a verdict, and we decline submissions that do not meet the content policy.
How long does review take?
Days rather than hours. We read your pricing page, your privacy policy and your acceptable use policy, we search for anything on the public record about how your product has behaved, and we use the product. Most of the elapsed time is the research, not the queue.
Can I write my own listing?
No. We write every listing, which is the point of the site. You can correct a factual error at any time and we will fix it quickly, but the description, the verdict and the limitations are ours.
What if you decline my tool?
We tell you why. If the reason is a missing policy page you can publish one and resubmit. If the reason is that your product falls outside what we cover, resubmitting will not change the answer.