
NoFilterGPT
Unfiltered assistant with images, video and an API, built around a claim that nothing is retained.
Last verified Uncensored AI
What is NoFilterGPT?
NoFilterGPT is a general unfiltered assistant rather than a companion or a character. One account covers chat, image generation, image editing, short video from a still, and voice in and out, with a REST API and code examples on GitHub. Its pitch is not adult content specifically but the absence of refusals, and it claims to keep no record of what you ask.
At a glance
| Category | Uncensored AI |
|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium |
| Starting price | $11.99 per month |
| Free tier | YesA limited number of messages per day, shorter responses, a customisable tone and limited image generation. The message allowance is not published as a number. |
| Free trial | No |
| Card required at signup | No |
| Account required | Yes |
| Payment methods | Card |
| Platforms | Web, API |
| Generation modes | Text chat, Text generation, Text to image, Image to image, Image to video, Text to speech |
| Content filtering | No documented output filter |
| Age policy | Self-declared at signup |
| Position on minors | Publishedread it |
| Data retention | The marketing and the terms both state that conversations are not logged or stored, that interactions are purged after being received, that even error logs are redacted, and that communications are encrypted with AES. The privacy policy itself makes no such statement and sets no retention period, mentioning only that generated video may sit on a CDN until purged.source |
| Trains on your content | Not documented |
| Deletion on request | Self-serve in account settings |
| Anonymous use | Not supported |
| Company | Not published, United States, by governing law. No state or entity is named |
| Last verified | by ClickTugger |
Product identity
| Official name | NoFilterGPT | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Operator | Not published | Documented |
| Jurisdiction | United States, by governing law. No state or entity is named | Documented |
| Website | nofiltergpt.com | Verified |
| Also known as | No Filter GPT, nofiltergpt.com | Verified |
What NoFilterGPT claims, and what we found
Each row is a claim the vendor makes on a public page, beside what the same vendor's other pages say. Where two of their documents disagree we record both rather than choosing one. All checked 9 Aug 2026.
| Vendor claim | What we found | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Conversations are not logged or stored | Stated on the homepage and in the terms. The privacy policy makes no such statement and sets no retention periodsource | Contradicted |
| Anonymous AI chat | An account and email address are required. The claim refers to retention rather than to registrationsource | Unclear |
Who it is for
People whose objection to mainstream assistants is refusals rather than a specific adult use case, and developers who want an unfiltered model behind an API without a separate plan. The free tier makes it cheap to test whether the filtering suits you, and image generation is capped identically on free and paid accounts at the moment.
Who it is not for
Anyone who needs a named counterparty, because no company is published anywhere. Anyone who wants a companion with memory and a persona. And anyone relying on the no-logging claim for something that matters, since the privacy policy does not repeat it.
Pricing
Professional is 11.99 US dollars a month for near unlimited chats, image analysis, image generation, API access and the mini tools. Basic is free with a limited daily message allowance and shorter responses. The vendor states that image generation is currently capped at 30 a day on every account including paid ones while it tests, so the paid tier mainly buys chat volume and the API.
Yes, and it is a tier rather than a trial. Basic gives a limited number of messages per day, shorter responses, a customisable tone and limited image generation, with no payment required. The daily message allowance is not published as a number, so how far it goes is something you find out by using it.
| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | Free |
|
| Professional | $11.99/month |
The vendor states all accounts, including paid ones, are currently capped at 30 image generations a day while it tests. |
Refunds: No refund window is published in the terms of service.
Signup friction
No. The free tier requires an account but no payment method. Despite the word anonymous in its own strapline, an account and an email address are required, so this is not anonymous in the sense of using it without registering.
- No card at signup
- Account required
- Anonymous use not supported
Platforms
Web browser plus a REST API, with Python, PHP and JavaScript usage examples published on GitHub. There is no mobile app.
- Web
- API
Feature matrix
Absence of evidence is not recorded as absence of a feature. Anything that needs an account to confirm is marked not tested rather than "no".
| Text chat | Yes | Documented |
|---|---|---|
| Character chat | Not offered | Documented |
| Image generation | Yes | Documented |
| Image to image | Yes | Documented |
| Video generation | Yes | Documented |
| Voice | Yes | Documented |
| Web | Yes | Documented |
| iOS | Not offered | Documented |
| Android | Not offered | Documented |
| Desktop | Not offered | Documented |
| API | Yes | Documented |
| Runs locally | No | Documented |
| Long-term memory | Needs an account | Not tested |
| Group chat | Needs an account | Not tested |
| Custom system prompt | Needs an account | Not tested |
| Model selection | Needs an account | Not tested |
Privacy and data
Two documents disagree about the most important claim. The homepage says interactions are purged after being received and even error logs are redacted, and the terms repeat that conversations are not logged or stored, both alongside a claim of AES encryption. The privacy policy says none of this. It sets no retention period, does not address model training, and mentions only that generated video may sit on a CDN until purged. Deletion is genuinely self-serve at a dedicated page, which is better than most listings here manage.
| Retention | The marketing and the terms both state that conversations are not logged or stored, that interactions are purged after being received, that even error logs are redacted, and that communications are encrypted with AES. The privacy policy itself makes no such statement and sets no retention period, mentioning only that generated video may sit on a CDN until purged.source |
|---|---|
| Trains on your content | Not documented |
| Deletion | Self-serve in account settings |
| Privacy policy | Read the vendor policy |
Privacy disclosure
| Trains on your content | Not addressed anywheresource | Not documented |
|---|---|---|
| Account deletion | A control in the account | Documented |
| Deletion control seen working | Needs an account | Not tested |
| Chat export | Needs an account | Not tested |
| Usable without an account | No, an account is required | Documented |
| Payment methods disclosed | Yes | Documented |
What the vendor lets you know before paying
This measures disclosure, not quality. A good product can document nothing, and that is worth knowing separately from whether it is any good.
| Price published | Yes, from $11.99source | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Operating company named | No | Not documented |
| Jurisdiction stated | United States, by governing law. No state or entity is named | Documented |
| Retention period stated | No period givensource | Not documented |
| Training policy stated | Nosource | Not documented |
| Refund terms published | Yes | Documented |
| Content policy published | Yessource | Documented |
| Position on minors published | Yessource | Documented |
Content policy and safety
NoFilterGPT documents its output filtering asno documented output filter, and its age policy as self-declared at signup.
NoFilterGPT does not offer clothing removal from photographs of real people. ClickTug does not list tools that do. Its stated position on the likeness of real people is that documented consent is required.
What the vendor prohibits
- Generating, editing, sharing or distributing content involving minors in sexual or exploitative contexts
The no-logging claim appears in marketing copy and in the terms but not in the privacy policy, which is the document that would normally carry it and which sets no retention period at all.
Vendor acceptable use policy · Vendor minor safety policy · ClickTug content policy
ClickTug verdict
A broad unfiltered assistant sold on a privacy promise that its own privacy policy does not make. The 11.99 dollar plan covers chat, image generation, image editing, video from a still, voice and an API, which is more surface than most competitors offer at that price, and the free tier is a genuine tier. The homepage and terms both say conversations are purged and nothing is logged. The privacy policy says neither, sets no retention period and does not address training. No company name or state is published anywhere.
Strengths
- One plan covers chat, images, editing, video from a still, voice and a documented API
- Free tier is a real tier, with no card and no expiry
- Account deletion is self-serve at a dedicated page rather than an email request
- Terms carry an explicit prohibition on content involving minors
- Image generation currently capped equally on free and paid accounts
Breadth for the money, and an unusually good deletion route. One 11.99 dollar plan covers chat, images, editing, video from a still, voice and an API, where most competitors sell two of those and charge separately for the rest. Account deletion is a page you visit rather than an email you send. The free tier is a real tier, and the terms carry an explicit prohibition on content involving minors.
Limitations
- The no-logging claim appears in marketing and terms but not in the privacy policy
- The privacy policy sets no retention period and does not address model training
- No company name, state or registered entity is published anywhere
- No refund window is published
- Anonymous in the strapline, but an account and email are required
The privacy claim that the whole product is built on is not in the privacy policy. No company name or state is published anywhere, so there is nobody identifiable behind the promise. And no refund window is published, which matters more when the counterparty is anonymous.
Hands on
NoFilterGPT sells one idea harder than any other service here: that nothing you type is kept. The homepage says interactions are purged after being received and that even error logs are redacted. The terms of service repeat it, stating plainly that the service does not log or store conversations. Both mention AES encryption. For a product whose users are largely there because mainstream assistants keep records, that is the entire proposition.
The privacy policy does not say it. Not in weaker words, not with caveats: the document that exists specifically to describe data handling sets no retention period, makes no no-logging commitment, and addresses model training not at all. What it does mention is that generated video may sit on a CDN for a while until the server purges it, which is a retention disclosure of a sort, and the only one there is.
We are not calling that dishonest. Marketing copy and terms are both places a company can make a binding claim, and a promise in the terms is a promise. It is simply strange to build a product on a commitment and leave it out of the document a careful reader checks first, and anyone choosing this service for that reason should know which page carries it.
What is not in doubt is the breadth. Eleven dollars ninety nine buys chat, image generation, image editing, short video from a still image, voice conversation both directions, and a REST API with examples in three languages on GitHub. Most competitors at that price sell chat and meter everything else. Image generation is currently capped at thirty a day on every account including paid ones, which the vendor states openly is a testing decision, and that honesty is worth noting even though the cap itself is a limitation.
The free tier is real rather than a trial, with a daily message allowance the vendor declines to quantify. Account deletion is genuinely self-serve at its own page, which sounds minor until you notice how many listings on this site require an email to support and a wait.
The gap is accountability. No company name appears anywhere. No state, no registered entity, no address, only a line saying United States law governs. A privacy promise is worth exactly as much as the ability to hold someone to it, and this one names nobody to hold.

How NoFilterGPT compares
Every figure on the right is computed across the 37 tools ClickTug currently tracks, at the moment this page was built. They are facts about this catalogue rather than about the market, and they move as it grows.
| Measure | NoFilterGPT | Across ClickTug |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $11.99 | $11.99 median of 17 that publish one |
| Publishes a price | Yes | 26 of 37 tracked |
| Free tier | Yes | 30 of 37 tracked |
| Names its operating company | No | 33 of 37 tracked |
| States a training position | No | 18 of 37 tracked |
| Publishes a position on minors | Yes | 23 of 25 hosted tools tracked |
At $11.99 a month, NoFilterGPT is cheaper than 7 of the 17 tools here that publish a starting price.
NoFilterGPT compared with the alternatives
Every cell is read from the same records as each tool's own listing, so nothing here can claim something its page denies. Rows needing an account to confirm are left out entirely rather than guessed at, and live in each listing's feature matrix instead.
| NoFilterGPT | Venice AI | Uncensored Chat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $11.99/mo | $18/mo | $9/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Card to start | No | No | No |
| Account required | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs on your hardware | No | No | No |
| Image generation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Video generation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Voice | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | No | No |
| Trains on your content | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Account deletion | In account | By request | In account |
| Company named | No | Yes | Yes |
| Position on minors | Published | Published | Published |

NoFilterGPT vs Venice AIFreemium
Choose Venice instead if you want the same breadth from a named Delaware company with a privacy policy that actually states its retention position, plus API access on the free tier.
NoFilterGPT vs Uncensored ChatFreemium
Choose Uncensored Chat instead if you want a stricter written policy on minors and one-off payment with no recurring charge, and can accept cryptocurrency as the only method.
Quick answers about NoFilterGPT
Generated from the same records as the tables above, so an answer here cannot contradict a figure there. Questions only appear when the answer says something specific to this product.
- Is NoFilterGPT free?
- There is a free tier. A limited number of messages per day, shorter responses, a customisable tone and limited image generation. The message allowance is not published as a number.
- How much does NoFilterGPT cost?
- Paid plans start at $11.99 a month. Every tier and what it includes is listed in the pricing section above, taken from the vendor's own page.
- Does NoFilterGPT require a credit card to start?
- No card is required to reach the free layer. One is needed for any paid plan.
- Does NoFilterGPT offer refunds?
- No refund window is published in the terms of service.
- Does NoFilterGPT have an app?
- No. It runs in a web browser only, which is common for adult products because both app stores restrict them.
- Does NoFilterGPT have an API?
- Yes. An API is documented, so the same model can be called from your own code rather than only through the interface.
- Can NoFilterGPT run locally?
- No. It is a hosted service, so everything you write reaches the vendor's servers.
- Can I delete my NoFilterGPT account?
- Yes, through a control in the account rather than by asking support.
- Is NoFilterGPT actually uncensored?
- ClickTug records no documented output filter, which is a different claim from having no rules: its terms still prohibit a specific list of conduct, set out above.
- What company owns NoFilterGPT?
- No operating company is published. United States, by governing law. No state or entity is named. A commitment is only worth as much as the ability to hold someone to it, which is why this is recorded rather than passed over.
NoFilterGPT FAQ
How much does NoFilterGPT cost?
Professional is 11.99 US dollars a month, covering near unlimited chats, image analysis and generation, API access and the mini tools. Basic is free, with a limited daily message allowance and shorter responses. The vendor states image generation is currently capped at 30 a day on every account, including paid ones, while it refines testing.
Does NoFilterGPT really not keep my conversations?
That is what it says in two places and not in a third. The homepage states interactions are purged after being received and that even error logs are redacted. The terms state conversations are not logged or stored. The privacy policy, which is the document that would normally carry such a commitment, does not repeat it and sets no retention period at all. We record what each document says rather than reconciling them for the vendor.
Is NoFilterGPT free?
There is a free Basic tier with a limited number of messages per day, shorter responses, a customisable tone and limited image generation. No card is required. The daily allowance is not published as a number, so the practical limit is something you discover in use.
Is NoFilterGPT anonymous?
Not in the sense of using it without registering. The strapline says anonymous and an account with an email address is still required. What the claim refers to is retention: the vendor says it does not keep conversations. Account deletion is available self-serve at a dedicated page, which does support the spirit of the claim.
Does NoFilterGPT have an API?
Yes, a REST API with Python, PHP and JavaScript usage examples published on GitHub. It is included in the 11.99 dollar Professional plan rather than sold as a separate developer product, which is unusual at this price.
Which company operates NoFilterGPT?
None is named. The terms state that United States law governs the agreement without identifying a state, an entity or an address. That is worth weighing against the privacy promises the service makes, because a commitment is only as good as the party who can be held to it.
How we checked NoFilterGPT
- Checked
- 9 August 2026
- Documents read
- 3
- Claims checked
- 2
- Documentation gaps
- 4
What we did
- Read every policy document linked from this page, in full
- Loaded the pricing page, and re-loaded it in a rendering browser where it was empty
- Checked the homepage against the pricing and policy pages for disagreement
- Ran the vendor's own homepage through ClickTug's excluded-terms gate
- Searched for reporting, incident-database entries and independent testing
- Captured the interface and reviewed the capture by eye
What we have not done
Everything below needs an account, and ClickTug does not hold one here. These are recorded as not tested rather than guessed at, which is why they are absent from the tables above rather than marked "no".
- Signup completed
- Email verification required
- Card required at signup
- First response generated
- Long-term memory
- Voice feature
- Character creation
- Delete-account control
- Chat export
- Cancellation flow
Verified ClickTug observed this directly on the vendor's own pages.Documented The vendor states this in a document we have linked.Not documented We read the document that would carry this and it is absent.Not tested Checking this needs an account. We have not held one, so we have not checked.
Sources for this listing
ClickTug last checked these facts on 9 Aug 2026 against 3 vendor sources. Pricing and data policies in this category change within weeks, so treat the date as part of the fact.
Something wrong or out of date? Report this listing. If this listing concerns you personally, use our removal request form.